Christianity

 

When the Israelites began to fall for the spiritual lies, God sent a steady stream of holy prophets to teach Israel his ways and to warn them of what would happen if they did not obey. The Israelites, through Moses, had been instructed to bring regular animal offerings or sacrifices before God. These sacrifices symbolized the payment for their sins, reminding them: that sin does not come without a penalty.

Jesus Christ was born circa 1 AD. The Message of forgiveness and the promise of eternal Life to those who believe in Christ would be carried forward from Israel to all nations. Although this gospel (the good news) spread in all directions, it would not be equally accepted by all peoples and would meet with more resistance in some places than in others. Those missionaries, for example, who carried the message into Babylon, Persia, and India were violently rejected; and only a small number of people received and believed the message there. Likewise today, in spite of nearly twenty centuries of missionary efforts in the Far East, with the exception of a few areas, the Message of Christ has been overwhelmingly rejected.
Only a small percent of the orient believes in Christ. Hinduism — the oldest surviving pantheistic religion is still being practiced by a majority of India's inhabitants.

Christ’s gospel was accepted by large numbers in the Mediterranean, in spite of fierce persecution against those who believed. Within a few generations there were so many Christians in this Region that the high priests of the Mysteries of Greece, Rome, and Egypt began to lose their control. The teachings of Christ went head-to-head against the pantheistic beliefs and occult practices of the priests, exposing them for what they were. The more the believers were persecuted, the larger their numbers grew, until finally the occult priests were forced to go underground in order to keep their secret knowledge and traditions alive.

The Bible is divided into two parts: the old and new testaments. The Old Testament consists of thirty-nine books by different authors, many of whom did not sign their manuscripts. In this case the books are ascribed traditionally to a prophet. These books were written before the advent of Jesus. They also contain the Torah or Law of Moses which is the first five books.

The New Testament is a collection of twenty-seven writings: four of which are the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) and one of which is acts. Acts is a history of the early Christian community as described by the author of Luke. All of these Gospels were written anonymously and are ascribed by those who collected the writings to names which were well known in Christian history. The following fourteen writings are assigned to Paul and are called epistles; Greek for letters. Of these fourteen epistles, only six and three quarters of one other are considered by Christian scholars to be genuine. The remaining seven and one quarter are from later writers who used Paul’s name to give their writings authenticity. The remaining eight books are ascribed to other authors.
The Old Testament opens with the book of Genesis, which in Hebrew is entitled bere’shit, “in the beginning” or “by way of beginning.”…. Likewise, the New Testament begins with the Gospel of Matthew tracing the line of Jesus. Matthew introduces his account with these words: “A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham” (1:1).

The Gospels and the Malachi 2

The life of Jesus as presented in the Gospels is a composite of an historical person and a Pauline interpretation of Messianic prophecy drawn by strangers from fabricated hearsay and misinformation. (Current theologians disregard the theory that there was a single written source, the Quelle, from which the authors of the synoptic gospels drew their information.) Thus, to discover the true Jesus, all paganism, philosophies and the polemics of false Messianic expectations must be filtered from the canonical scriptures. What remains should be facts whose accuracy can be judged by the true prophecies of the Old Testament.

Jesus was born in Roman occupied Palestine, into a religiously divided society which was being subverted by the blasphemies of both the Sadducees and the Pharisees. Since the Romans allowed the Jews to govern in religious affairs, both of these sects were able to enforce their subverted version of the religion of Abraham and Moses through joint control of the court of the Sanhedrin. It was in this court that the common, illiterate Palestinian Jew was forced under pain of death to subscribe to the blasphemies imposed on him by both parties. The Romans complied by acting as agents of the court when they allowed religious penalties which demanded death under Talmudic law to be changed to crimes against the Roman occupation so that the death sentence could be executed.

Jesus had to deal with the triple threat of Sadducees, Pharisees and Romans. It was the presence of these three parties which defined Jesus’ prophetic mission to “the lost sheep of Israel”.

Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says: With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. Judaism was synonymous with Pharisaism even, the main distinguishing characteristic of the Jews was a belief in an Oral Law that God gave to Moses at Sinai along with the Torah.

Jesus Christ had strongly accused them of hypocrisy and pretentiousness, and pronounced upon them a succession of woes. Jesus Christ said they nullified all the Commandments of God by their Tradition, "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9, etc.). His invective, in truth, cannot be equalled. All of Matthew 23 is like a whiplash. He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed beautiful outwardly, but "inside full of dead men's bones and of all uncleanness." Christ climaxed one condemnation after another with the expletive, "Hypocrites!" He called the Pharisees children of them that killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying and persecuting until the guilt for all the righteous bloodshed from Abel on down would be upon them.

The Prophetic Mission: Jesus Condemns the Sadducees and the Pharisees

Jesus’ mission is clearly described in Malachi chapter two. He was to turn many away from iniquity and the tribes were to seek the law “at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the Lord of Hosts.” Jesus fulfilled this prophecy to the letter. He turned the common people away from the corruption of the Sadducees and the Pharisees by reaffirming the Law of Moses, by cursing them both for not following him (Matt. 23:37) and for asking him questions designed to trap him into making legalistic errors or condemning the Roman occupation (see Matthew 22 and Mark 12). Matthew 3:7 states: “But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warnen you to flee from the wrath to come?”

Matthew 23 continues with the condemnation:

Then spoke Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat… 

Preaches the Kingdom of God and the Law of Moses

Jesus not only condemned the Sadducees and Pharisees, he reaffirmed the Law of Moses and preached the “Kingdom of God” which Muslims call the “unseen”. Jesus began in Matthew, chapter five by offering a comforting message of hope in the hereafter to the poor, illiterate Jews of Palestine:
And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain and when he was set, his disciples came unto him: And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying, Blessed….
Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

The persecutors who persecuted the prophets that Jesus refers to were not aliens but the religious leaders of Jerusalem as the Son of Mary explains in Luke 13:31-35:
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent to thee; . . .

Affirms the Law of Moses

The second part of the prophecy of Malachi is that the prophet/ priest would reaffirm the true Law of Moses that Jesus accused the Pharisees of corrupting in Matthew 15:1-15:
Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem saying, why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? ….

To emphatically confirm the supremacy of the Law of Moses over the man-made traditions of the elders and to make clear his mission of restoring the purity of the Torah as foretold in Malachi, Jesus announced to his disciples and
to the multitudes hearing his preaching from the mountain in Matthew 5:17-20:
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the (books of the) prophets: I am not to destroy, but to fulfil. . .

Why Jesus Christ denunciated Pharisaism, one needs proof, offered by the irrefutable exhibits from Jewish authorities that the Talmud reverses every one of the Ten Commandments, the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, and enshrines their opposites under a "whited sepulchre" which is a disguise for murder and "all uncleanness," as Christ charged. Murder of non-Pharisees is always permitted; theft, sodomy, incest, rape are all permitted. For example, the righteousness of grown men violating baby girls under three is a favourite topic for discussion in book after book of the Talmud.

Talmudic literature is one long paean of praise for the very name Babylon, and all that it means to Babylonian Talmudism today, whereas it is a term of reproach in Old and New Testaments. The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the Babylonian Exile in the Sixth pre-Christian Century … When a thousand years later, the Babylonian Talmud assumed final codified form in the year 500 after the Christian era, the Roman Western Empire had ceased to be.

 

The Bible manipulated

The Bible under Talmudic Judaism is considered to be a collection of simple tales fit only for fools, women and children.

The Talmud "sages" thus must find new meanings in it by letter and number tricks which reverse the plain meaning and create out of it the permission to do otherwise forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are continually misused, misquoted and manipulated for purposes of blasphemy and reversal.

Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," the Talmud "sages" teach that "God made a covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted orally." And the Biblical "basis" of this is given as Exodus 34:27. But that verse states, instead: "And the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel" —just the opposite! (Talmud, Gittin 60b) The Talmudic reversal of Moses' written words are said to have been transmitted "orally," and through Moses himself !

The Scribes were the Pharisee teachers of the Law of Moses, carefully changed to comprise the Talmud so that a Biblical law may be acceptable."

The Torah in its narrow sense is the Old Testament, and in a still narrower meaning the first five books (Pentateuch) of Moses. In its wider Judaistic use it means the Old Testament as misinterpreted by the Pharisaic Talmud.

The first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud was in 1903 by Rodkinson (real name — M. Levi Frumkin), and was edited by Rabbi Isaac M. Wise, "Father" of so-called "Reform Judaism." Rodkinson deleted much of the filth which is in the unexpurgated Talmud, and used no identifying folio numbers, as were in the original, but nevertheless, even this abridged translation proved very revealing.

Regarding the contents of Talmud, it must be remembered that only with the relatively unexpurgated Soncino translation of the Talmud in this century, in the contemporary language, English, has it become possible for the non-Jew to receive the full impact of what the Talmud says. In other trials arguments could rage as to what a Yiddish or Hebrew text of the Talmud really meant, if translated. Nevertheless, the Jews always ultimately lost such arguments, as witness the condemnation of the Talmud by non-Jews through the centuries.

Even the Soncino English translation of the Talmud is not readily available except in major libraries, to be read there and not taken out.
Clement VII (another Medici servant of Jewry) was the bastard son of Guilio, brother of Lorenzo the Magnificent, who founded a pagan salon, the Platonic Academy. The Platonic Academy attempted the old Talmudic strategy of "harmonizing" pagan philosophy with Christianity, as Maimonides had tried to do with Biblical Judaism. Lorenzo had his son Giovanni (Leo X) made a Cardinal, through his influence with Innocent VIII, at 13, having also been made an Archbishop at 7. Ready to ascend the throne, Giovanni promptly made five of his relatives Cardinals, including his bastard cousin, Giulio. Leo X (Giovanni), made Pope on March 11, 1513, was ordained a priest on the 15th and made a Bishop on the 19th of the same month, and he reigned until December 1, 1521, nine years.
It was this Pope, Leo X, who launched the selling of indulgences in 1517, the immediate cause of Luther's break with the Church, and of Europe's arousal. Every effort was made to corrupt and Talmudize the Church from the inside, while Jewry worked to wreck it from the outside. The hotheads among Jews, says Jewish historian Cecil Roth, expected to end Christianity and supplant it with Talmudism.

Jewish Cabalism in Christianity

Aaron ben Samuel is credited with bringing the mysterious doctrine from Babylonia to Italy about the middle of the Ninth Century; thence it spread to almost all over Europe. (Jewish Encyclopedia, page 616)

There was an expression of Cabala among the Spanish conversos in the late 1200s which continued until the expulsion of the late 1400s. There is not a whole lot on these Spanish Cabalists, e.g., Abner of Burgos (b. ca. 1270) and Pablo de Heredia (140?-1486), in the English literature available. On Burgos and Heredia (as well as Pico and his contemporary Abraham Farissol), “The Beginnings of the Christian Kabbalah,” in The Christian Kabbalah: Jewish Mystical Books and Their Christian Interpreters, edited by Joseph Dan (Cambridge: Harvard College Library, 1997). This article was originally published in German: “Zur Geschichte der Anfange der Christlichen Kabbala” in Essays Presented to Leo Baeck in the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday (London: East and West Library, 1954), then in French: “Considerations sur l’Histoire des debuts de la Kabbale chretienne” in Kabbalistes Chretiens (Paris: Albin Michel, 1979).

Jewish tradition and its relationship to Christian thought by scholars of the calibre of Moshe Idel and David Ruderman has moved a long way from the initial groundbreaking studies of Gershom Scholem on Jewish mysticism and Kabbalah, or from Frances Yates, Paolo Rossi and D. P. Walker, who first mentioned the more “esoteric” and pluralistic aspects of prisca theologia in Christian intellectual circles and whose writings are now familiar to anyone undertaking the study of early modern thought. Yates in particular played an important role in signalling the presence of the Kabbalah in the Neoplatonic circles in England and on the Continent, inspired by the Italian School founded by Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola.

Undoubtedly there were Christians not only familiar with Jewish Kabbalah but who considered themselves to be practicing Kabbalists while remaining wholly within whatever form of Christianity they embraced, whether Catholic or Protestant.

Pico was most likely one of them. Historian has used the term “Kabbalist” differently, sometimes to indicate Christian Hebraic scholars who focused specifically on recuperating, translating and commenting Jewish Kabbalistic works, sometimes simply to indicate a Christian thinker who makes essentially very general remarks on the subject. Kabbalah was common knowledge in the sixteenth century.
Recent scholarly debate on the impact of the Kabbalah, a form of Jewish mysticism, on the development of early modern Christian thought has been divided over whether the reception of the Kabbalah was motivated by philo- or anti-Semitism.
The recognition of influence of Judaism on Christianity, and the progress made not only by scholarship on Jewish-Christian relations but also in what was once called the “occult philosophy”.
The Renaissance saw the birth also of Christian Kabbalah (also Christian Cabbala, Christian Cabala). Interest grew among some Christian scholars in what they saw to be the mystical aspects of Judaic Kabbalah, which was compatible with Christian mystical thought.

The movement was influenced by a desire to interpret aspects of Christianity even more mystically than current Christian Mystics. Greek Neoplatonic documents came into Europe from Constantinople in the reign of Mehmet II. Neoplatonism had been prevalent in Christian Europe and had entered into Scholasticism since the translation of Greek and Hebrew texts in Spain in the 13th century.
Ramon Llull (ca. 1232-1316), “the first Christian to acknowledge and appreciate Kabbalah as a tool of conversion”.
The strand of Cabala which has become best known began in Renaissance Florence with Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-94). Pico sought to harmonize Christian beliefs with Kabbalah, which he considered a primal form of Jewish doctrine which originated with Moses (if not Adam) and thus long presaged the teachings of Jesus.

Martin Luther and The Talmud

Martin Luther first met the Jews very tolerantly and showed a big interest in the Hebrew language. He hoped to be capable to convert the Jews to the Christian belief, however as that failed, he was of the opinion that they refused God's love consciously. 1543, he wrote the book, “Von the Jews and their lies ", in which he asked the Christians, to burn the synagogues to destroy the apartments of the Jews to prohibit that the rabbis teachings and to make the life in each imaginable way for the Jew heavily. Protestant anti- Semites refer to Luther and his writing since then again and again. 

When Pope Leo X started selling indulgences in 1517, this helped precipitate Luther's break with the Church, and the nailing of his theses on the door of the Wittenberg Cathedral. Almost immediately Jews flocked to the new Protestant banner. Luther was sought after by 4 Jews. He in turn wrote a laudatory publication, "Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew," filled with sympathy for their long unbelief, which Luther laid to the unsympathetic attitude of the Catholic Popes and hierarchy, and on his part welcoming the Jews to his heart.

Present-day Catholic and Protestant sources are largely ignorant, however, of the fact that, later, Luther found that Jews who had encouraged him to break with the Church were  attempting to Judaize his followers. He then read the Talmud, as introduced to him by a truly converted Jew. Afterwards, he wrote "The Jews and Their Lies," with such denunciatory philippics that they make parallel utterances of the Popes almost pale by comparison — this only after he became aware of the truth. Luther wrote, in "The Jews and Their Lies:"
Luther also quoted John 8:39 and verse 44, wherein Christ told the Pharisees: "Ye are of your father the Devil," and warns Christians to "be on their guard against these hardened condemned people — who accuse God of lying and proudly despise the whole world … They are boastful, proud fools …" He goes on to call them "Liars and Bloodhounds." Luther then cites the book of Esther. Catholic and Protestant theologians in all centuries have protested Esther as being unhistorical, irreligious (the name of God does not once appear in it) and out of place in the Bible.
Luther states:
They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end without ceasing, with their interpretations … O, how they love that book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their revengeful people — they who imagine themselves to be the people of God, who desire to think they must murder and crush the heathen … As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do so now, if only they could …
Without any modern-day Jewish Encyclopedias or Soncino translations of the Babylonian Talmud, one sees that Luther nevertheless understood perfectly the way the Talmud blasphemes and hangs obscene charges on Christ through double talk and words (the Balaam passages of the Talmud are an example of this, but Luther names others). Luther recognized that any Messiah expected by Jewry was only supposed to lead them in slaughter to power, stating:

The Jews desire no more from their Messiah than that he should be a Kochba" (leader of the Pharisee revolt against Rome in 135 A.D., in which according to historian Gibbon, about a million non-Jews were sadistically slaughtered) "and a worldly king, who would slay the Christians, divide the world among the Jews and make them rich lords …
Luther reflected upon that passage in II Peter 2 about those who "speak great swelling words of vanity," promise liberty, but "they themselves are the servants of corruption … For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they had known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them …."
Luther also wrote:
How much better it would be if they did not have God's Commandment or did not know it. For if they did not have it, they would be uncondemned. They are condemned because they have God's Commandment and do not keep it, but act against it without ceasing … In like manner murderers and whores, thieves and scoundrels and all evil men could boast they are God's holy and chosen people, because they have His Word and know that they should fear and obey him …
By then Luther knew the Talmud, and he continued:

The heathen philosophers write much more honorably … They write that man by nature is obligated to serve others, also to keep his word to his enemies … Yea, I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of Talmudists and Rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews. Should someone think I am saying too much — I am not saying too much, but much too little! For I see in their writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury … they play us all manner of mean tricks; what is worst of all, they … teach that such should be done. No Heathen has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself, and those whom he possesses like he possesses the Jews.

Luther continued as to the Talmud:
Thus they call Him [Jesus] the child of a whore and His mother, Mary, a whore, whom she had in adultery … Reluctantly I must speak so coarsely in opposing the Devil … We do not call our wives whores as they call Maria, the Mother of Jesus; we do not call them bastards, as they call our Lord Christ. We do not curse them, but wish them all manner of bodily and spiritual good; permit them to lodge with us. We don't steal and mutilate their children; do not poison their water; do not thirst after their blood …
Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us!

Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by Jews in all the world. For nearly 300 years we might well complain that during that time they captured and killed the Christians, which is the clear truth. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem. On top of that no one is holding them now. Land and highways are open to them … They are a heavy burden to us in our country, like a plague, pestilence, and nothing but misfortune … Should the Devil not laugh and dance, when in this manner he can have his paradise among us Christians … and to thank us … blasphemes and curses God and man! … Now what are we going to do with these rejected condemned Jewish people?

After Luther became conversant with the Talmud and the ritual cursings of so-called "Judaism," his counsel exactly matched that of the ever-reenforced edicts of the beleaguered Popes. A person who condones such blasphemies, he said, partakes of them. He said they should be forced to leave the country:
We should not suffer it, after they are among us and we knew about such lying, blaspheming and cursing among them, lest we become partakers of their lies, cursing and blaspheming …
Spiritually, Luther connects the Jews with those who betrayed Moses: "Of such are the remaining dregs of the Jews, of whom Moses knows nothing; they also know nothing of him, for they do not keep one passage in Moses."

This reminds one of the constantly recurring charge of Christ that the Pharisees violated and nullified the laws of Moses, such as: "The Scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses seat." (Matt. 23:2) In other words, they occupy his throne giving forth as Mosaic Law, their own foul permissions which they attribute to "Oral" laws Moses handed down to their group, unknown to the rest of the world.
In 1543 Luther replied to the Talmudic charge that Jesus did His miracles by magic with the Tetragrammaton, or Shem Hamphorash, the consonants of the word Jehovah (by which Rabbis supposedly summon demons).
Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain … that the Jews, as they are today, are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over … to afflict the different Nations with their usury, to spy upon others, and to betray, to poison wells, to deceive and to kidnap children — in short, to practice all kinds of dishonesty and injury.
Digressing from Luther's "The Jews and Their Lies," we see in Luther's "Table Talk" his view of the "converted" Jew:
If a Jew, not converted at heart, were to ask baptism at my hands, I would take him on to the bridge, tie a stone round his neck, and hurl him into the river; for these wretches are wont to make a jest of our religion. (CCLVI)

Luther's Last Sermon

Repeatedly, Luther warns the clergy against participation in the blasphemies of Judaism, by aiding or enduring these in any way. His last sermon included this:
You, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ; they call our blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and Her Son a bastard … if they could kill us all, they would gladly do so; in fact many of them murder Christians, especially those professing to be surgeons and doctors. They know how to deal with medicaments in the manner of the Italians — the Borgias and Medicis — who gave people poison which brought about their death in one hour or a month … As a good patriot I wanted to give you this warning for the very last time to deter you from participating in alien sins. You must know I only desire the best for you all, rulers and subjects.

The enlightenment entailed tolerance-thinking also opposite the Jews: The USA, France and then Prussia declared since 1787, the equality of the Jews, (the irony with it is later that exactly in the united states which introduced this so progressive way of thinking as first and as which, “Motherland of the democracy " is known, the American blacks were still over 150 years later not equally entitled.) This equality happened of course only to restrictions: broadly they were applied only to baptized Jews.

What has that to do with us today?

What a group of Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over!" However, the missing link of understanding on the subject of "Pharisees" is best supplied by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):
The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of that literature … and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.

Few Christians realize that the very practices of Paganism for which the Prophet Isaiah denounced the Judaites about 698 BC, are in use today in Judaism. (Lingering in cemeteries to invoke the dead and eating swine’s flesh, which was sacred to the sex-goddess Astarte)
Many good Christians believe that present-day Jews are heir to God’s promise to Abraham, (Genesis 12:3 and 22:18) — ‘I will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curseth thee; because thou hast obeyed my voice.”
Often, when this verse is discussed, whether in the pulpit or on radio and TV, a common interpretation is that the Non- Jews must always help the Jews and never criticize them or say anything against them, because if they do otherwise, will be cursed by God.

In the Old Testament Scriptures, God’s chosen people were known as Israelites or Jews. The promise in Genesis was given to Abraham “because thou hast obeyed my voice.” Today’s Jews, as for almost 2,000 years, have not obeyed God’s voice, but have rejected.
The Old Testament prophets, speaking infallibly and without error, thus foresaw this development, and that there would be a group called Israel and Jew which would not be the rightful heirs of Abraham.

Non-Jews are almost inundated currently with propaganda designed to promote “brotherhood” between Christians and anti-Christian Talmudic Jews. The heavily-financed National Conference of Christians and Jews is one of the organizations promoting this impossibility, that is, if one knows what so-called Judaism really stands for.
Such tactics are nothing more but Gnosticism, which dates back to the time of Christ, and before, and is claimed by Jewry as its own. (Jewish Encyclopedia)
Down the centuries the Gnostic heresies all but rubbed Christianity out.

Like Biblical “Higher Criticism,” the term gnosis (knowledge) assumes a superior way of harmonizing opposites. Gnosticism has been defined as “a system of syncretizing, an attempt to blend opposite and contradictory tenets into one system to produce union and concord.” The Jews today, as always, have been ever active gnostics. Fantastic financing on their part today features “Brotherhood” between Christians and Jews.

These Gnostic activities are accomplished by “boring from within” Christian denominations, themselves. For example, the report of the American Jewish Committee in its American Jewish Yearbook (Vol. 53, 1952) which boasts (page 559) of:
“significant advances … in achieving the elimination of hostile references from Christian textbooks and lesson books, particularly relating to the Crucifixion story … Largely due to our efforts … 85% of Protestant textbooks are free of:
“ significant advances … in achieving the elimination of hostile references from Christian textbooks and lesson books. Particularly relating to the Crucifixion story … Largely due to our efforts … 85% of Protestant textbooks are free of disparaging references to the Jew.

Similar, though not quite as extensive, results have been achieved among Catholics … Arrangements have been completed with … the National Council of Churches whereby the AJC and ADL [i.e. Anti- Defamation League of B’nai B’rith] will jointly … aid in the preparation lesson materials, study guides and visual aids … sponsored by the Protestant organizations.”
Many other instances of similar activities could be cited, and as to which Jews are enthusiastically aided by non-Jews, which brings to mind that all of Christ’s denunciations were not for the Pharisees themselves. He said of the Pharisees: “ye compass land and sea to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” (Matt. 23: 15) Strong words, indeed.

Today, in public affairs, the proselytes of the great Jewish banking and industrial Czars are actually better fronts, often even more zealous, than masters in building for the One World Government; More and more proselytes enter the movement for “Brotherhood” between the crucifiers and the Crucified, leading to overcome the latter.

 

 

To be continued.... -->

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEE ALSO:	| World Religions | Abrahamic Religion | Judaism | Islam | Hinduism | Buddhism | Paganism | Helenic Judaism | Gnosticism | Cabalism | Knights Templars| | Freemasons | The Illuminati |
GO TO:	•CONTACT • ARCHIVE • PUBLICATION •
Created by:	Salauddine Mohammed Faruque on July 25,2007, last updated on 12.08.2009